|
PRESS RELEASE:
July 21, 2004
OFFICIAL RESULTS:
Rural Council
survey of rural attitudes...
The Rural Council
is pleased to announce the results of its first public opinion poll,
conducted in July, 2004.
The results reflect an extraordinary level
of dissatisfaction with the performance of the City of Ottawa since amalgamation, and a sweeping endorsement for the Rural Council's
efforts to bring about change in governance.
The response, which
overwhelmingly supports De-Amalgamation as an option, clearly
demonstrates that the disapproval level is a direct result of the
formation of the new City.
We will continue to evaluate public
opinion in this regard and will now start to compare the results of
this poll with future polls to commence in suburban areas of the
City.
The results are set out below:
|
Results:
Survey of Rural
Attitudes - July, 2004
| |
| |
Our Mission Statement
The Rural Council is a
coalition of rural citizens and
organizations representing communities,
property
owners and small business, dedicated to the
preservation and protection of rural rights,
values and
freedom from unwarranted urban regulation,
through education, advocacy and political
leverage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Survey Questions |
Goulbourn |
Rideau/Osgoode |
West Carleton |
1.)
Based on the Mission Statement above, do
you support the efforts of the Rural Council to bring about change? -----------------
(YES),
(NO):
|
Yes: 97% |
Yes:
92.3% |
Yes:
91% |
2.)
Are you satisfied with the governance being
provided to you by the new City of Ottawa
since amalgamation? ---------------
(YES),
(NO):
|
No: 95% |
No: 90% |
No: 91% |
3.)
Would you support DEAMALGAMATION
as an option? --------------------------
(YES),
(NO):
|
Yes: 84% |
Yes:
91.5% |
Yes: 85% |
4.)
Should the City and the Province comply with any
change endorsed by a majority of
voters? -----------------------------------
(YES),
(NO):
|
Yes: 92% |
Yes: 92% |
Yes:
93% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
END of PRESS
RELEASE - DATED: JULY 21, 2004
|
A few of the
comments received with your survey forms...
Main
areas of concern appear to be the disenfranchisement of rural
residents under the amalgamated City of Ottawa, and the city's
hugely wasteful spending ...at a time when services are
drastically reduced.
|
"It is appropriate that your questions all deal with 'Democracy'. In the stampede to amalgamate rural areas
with Ottawa’s urban core, it is clear that any hope for fair and
democratic due process in the handling of rural interests, has been
brutally trampled in the charge."
“Since
amalgamation, our taxes have increased and services decreased. We
have unwanted restrictions to conservation areas, as well as
decisions that are being made which are not in the best interests of
Richmond – i.e.: pipeline for Munster sewage when on-site solution
would have been cheaper and would have affected far less residents.
City councillors who have no interest in this area have made
uninformed decisions.”
“The urban
councilors have little understanding and no interest in rural
issues. They want to paint the whole city with the same brush and
it does not work. They will try to dilute our rural voice as soon
as the OMB is dismantled by the Liberals. Then we will have no
impact in Ottawa decisions.”
“I am definitely
in favour of deamalgamation. The mega city has done absolutely
nothing for the rurals and now we have decisions in zoning and allow
sub-divisions to be set up being made by city councillors who know
absolutely nothing about the rural areas and the concerns of the
farmers. Remember, when a piece of land is turned into urban
property with buildings and streets on it, it is lost forever to the
farming community. We must protect the future of our
grandchildren.”
“My long term
plans are to move out of the City of Ottawa boundaries. I find our
rural representation has little influence at council, which is
further diluted by having the likes of (XX) representing Goulbourn.
City laws and regulations simply do not work in rural communities.”
“Services have
suffered badly since amalgamation. I'm not happy, neither is my
wife.”
“How compatible
could rural needs be with those of a city? (The suggestion of) adding water meters to
rural wells is absurd.”
“Best of luck in
your endeavours. Keep your fight valid by staying away from
fanatical non-negotiable points of view. There is always room to
move between reasonable people.”
“I do not feel
that Richmond is well represented by city council. The Munster
wastewater pipeline is an excellent example of their indifference to
the wishes of myself and my community. The city of Ottawa as it
stands now does not understand or is unable to understand our
concerns.”
“Keep up the good
work. We need a voice in the rural areas.”
"I think the
Rural Council has an important role to play."
"Amalgamation was forced upon us, (from the top,
down) ---all in the name of "saving tax dollars". In reality, we got
the opposite: a costly, cumbersome, poorly-managed, unaccountable
bureaucracy, which has robbed us of our rural representation, and has
taken more in taxes from the rurals and given less in
services than we had before amalgamation."
“We think rural
residents and property owners have lost their rights since
amalgamation due to the irrelevance of city regulations in rural
areas.”
“Ottawa’s
minority rural voice has not only been ignored: it never had a
chance.”
“The sooner
de-amalgamation occurs the better!”
“When I purchased
my property in West Carleton, I was not aware that
they had voted to become part of the City of Ottawa. So I was
disappointed when I
found that out. I'd moved from Kanata to get away from "the City".
I'm still learning about the implications of being in a rural area
that is governed by a City, and I'm still learning about the issues
that are being discussed, that affect our rural way of
living. I do feel that the City does not understand nor wishes to
preserve our
rural values and way of living. Our community centres are in danger
of being closed, we're down to 1 day at week at the Kinburn Client
Centre. I don't feel they have
our rural interests at heart. The Mayor just has an arrogance about
him that illustrates that he doesn't really care about our concerns.
I would support deamalgamation from the City of Ottawa.”
“Very unhappy
being a part of City Of Ottawa. I feel we are left out and get
nothing, or are not even heard of.”
“Keep up the good
work!”
“I was born in
old Ottawa. The Ottawa we have now is not the Ottawa I had under
Charlotte Whitten, so I moved out but unfortunately Constance Bay
was not far enough. I am fed up with goody-goody lefties who ‘know
what's good for you’.”
“Not only am I
annoyed with the city, I'm getting more and more irritated with the
province (water quality standards and 170/03). Only half in jest, I
ask: 'Can we deamalgamate from the province?'”
“We are residents
of Nepean and wish to deamalgamate A.S.A.P., based on the city
of Ottawa's attitude and lack of performance. The community looks
like a cow pasture full of weeds, the snow removal is much less than
it should be, they are out of touch with the property owners every
where except special interest groups in the core city. Their N.D.P.
socialistic mind set, wasting millions paying off beauracrats that
haven't fullfilled their contractual obligations. The Mayor appears
to have absolutely no interest in helping solve problems out in the
suburbs, or those that the rural farming community are facing. All this,
for one of the highest taxes of most major cities in Canada.
We have
to take back control of our expenses and taxes. Get rid of all these sleezy, beauracratic, well-connected free loaders, like the head of
Ottawa Hydro who wrote himself ~$400,000.00
in addition to his salary, the Mayor, and all but 5 or 6 councillors.
Can you imagine, they want an annual salary increase $80,000.00 to
100,000.00/ year, for all their long hours ...do they think we're
that stupid?” (Joint signatures)
“I want OUT of
the amalgamated city. The urban agenda does not serve me well --
increased taxes, fewer services. Most of all, I am badly served by
the complete lack of knowledge, and lack of interest in rural
issues. I don't believe that Ottawa intends to redress this --
after all, we are a small minority compared to the vast urban
majority. I think Council sees us as a temporary annoyance, to be
endured until we lose momentum, and finally toe the line.”
“Thank you for
working on the concerns of rural residents. Each day we see many
examples of lack of services by the new city.”
“Thank you for
your leadership. We are supportive and willing to assist. Please
contact us. Thank you.”
“We have no
voice. What works for the inner city does not work for the rural
areas.
Lets put a stop to the nonsense and get back to our roots.”
"L.C.: proud to be a member of our growing associations:
Member of Willola Beach Property Owners Association, Rural Council
Member, LLA member. Lets get out there and make our voices heard.”
“I believe it is
time to push for a de-amalgamation for the rural wards, as a binding
question during the next election.”
"To the Rural Council: Please keep up
the great work. You MUST continue to help ordinary citizens regain
their rights. I don’t know who else can be as effective."
“I'm tired of
wasteful spending and the new rules of the dictators that we have
now.
Give me back our Goulbourn Township and the control that we the
people had.”
“Rural dwellers
should have been able to vote (separately) on amalgamation, in the first place. It
was not done by democratic methods.”
"Even though I didn't want
amalgamation, reducing duplication in levels of government should
have been a good thing. Unfortunately, the daffy people we have
running this organization have their own elitist, idealistic and
baffling agenda of issues which we are told are in our best
interests for a better "quality of life".
Finding efficiencies and savings
does not enter their agenda...someone may lose their job. There are
way too many people employed by this city and it tries to be all
things to all people, instead of doing only the core things a
City is supposed to do.
Let us out! FREE OSGOODE!
Thanks."
"We've had
enough of big city B.S. It now takes 5 people to do one person's
work at 50% more wages. ...We want out!"
"Old Ottawa
residents and people living in the former townships have much in
common. Maybe between us we can finally fix Amalgaville."
"Deamalgamation?
- The sooner the better, before we have to buy back all our
municipal buildings."
"I believe that
de-amalgamation is possible. Osgoode Township should have its
reserve funds returned. New and newer assets removed from the
former township (and replaced with older urban equipment) like
fire-trucks, ice resurfacers, snowplows, etc., should also be
returned."
"Since
amalgamation our taxes have gone up considerably, but services have
declined. It seems that the whole purpose of municipal government
(to provide basic services such as garbage removal, snow plowing,
police and fire services) has been all but forgotten. There seems to
be no desire for fiscal responsibility on the part of this council,
and rural ratepayers are weary of paying for services they do not
receive."
PRESS COVERAGE - RE: Rural Council
Survey...
-
City life not for rurals: Survey - Survey says! Rural
residents want out. ... online survey, and the results mirror the
sentiments of those who completed the hard-copy survey. The survey
asked residents if they were satisfied with City Hall
governance. It also asked if residents favoured deamalgamation. 800
HITS A DAY...(OttawaSun/News/2004/07/25)
|