|
"Unable to trust the city"... cited as main reason for the land clearing
"The
city says it's going to put the designations on hold. But it also says it will fix its
drainage problems ...and nothing is happening!"
|
Anger on 'wetlands'
Landowners to protest city's designation by clearing out land
By KENNETH JACKSON Metro
Ottawa
Some Ottawa property owners are
looking to preempt a city wetland designation tonight by scraping
their land clean of vegetation.
Bulldozers and high-hoes will be
used tonight at 6:30 p.m. to clear vegetation at Doug Healy's
farmstead at 7072 Flewellyn Rd. in Ottawa's west end, in a protest
against what rural property owners call unprecedented municipal
interference in their affairs.
Healy would rather bulldoze the
land than allow Ottawa to designate a portion of it as wetlands,
without compensation to him. The designation would render the land
useless to him, Healey said.
"What would you do if someone was
trying to steal your land? You would take it back," Healy said
yesterday. "They said it contained vegetation that is protected as
wetlands, so I will remove the vegetation."
Sixty rural landowners in Goulbourn
ward have been notified that 650 acres of their properties are
considered wetlands.
| |
| |
"What would you do if someone was
trying to steal your land? You would take it back.
They said it contained vegetation that is protected as
wetlands, so I will remove the vegetation."
- Doug Healy, Goulbourn landowner
|
|
|
|
|
"The city is forcing us to do it."
Healy said, adding that the designations will lower property values
by about 80 per cent.
Tony Walker, president of the
Goulbourn Landowners Associations, said the city had provincial
assessors fly over in airplanes to evaluate their properties.
"That's because no one gave them
permission to do a walk through the land," Walker said. "The
Ministry of Environment has a manual they go by and if more than 50
per cent of the vegetation is in this manual, they can deem it
wetlands."
While the province designates
significant wetlands, the city has authority to expand those
designations and regulate how the land can be used.
The owners are not against
protecting wetlands, Walker said, but oppose the city's unilateral
move without compensation.
Glenn Brooks, a city councillor in
the rural Rideau ward, said the city has agreed to a moratorium on
designations until after the upcoming Rural Summit. But he
understands some landowners' frustration with the policy makers.
"What's happening here is city
policy people are putting owners of land in a more difficult
position than they were not in before," Brooks said.
"If I had lands that were going to
be designated wetlands, I think I would make them agricultural
lands," Brooks said.
Rural Council Follow-up...
Good on his
word...
Doug Healy moves to
protect his land values from destructive city policy
The 'scorched earth' approach doesn't
make for a pretty sight, but it worked for the Russians on more than
one occasion as defense against invading armies. Now Goulbourn
landowners are feeling the need to use it, again, to protect
themselves from their own councillor's invasion of their land use
rights.
Doug Healy, lives on Flewellyn
Road, in the vicinity of most of the other sixty landowners who were
subjected to clandestine aerially-assessed wetland designations, initiated two
years ago by the vice-chair of the Rideau Valley Conservation
Authority ---who just happens to be their very own ward councillor.
|

| |
Goulbourn
resident, Doug Healy, being interviewed beside twenty acres of
bulldozed vegetation. He felt he was forced to take these
desperate measures to protect himself from politicians and
bureaucrats who don't protect the interests of the taxpayers who pay their
salaries.
|
|
|
Councillor Stavinga
has put herself into an interesting predicament. More wetland
acreage has been lost in Goulbourn ---to development--- than in any
other ward in the city, under Stavinga's watch.
It seems the RVCA has
a quota system for wetlands. According to the RVCA, Goulbourn should
have around 6% of its lands as wetlands. It has dropped to around
4%.
Landowners feel that
their lands are being unfairly targeted in order to fill the
vice-chair's embarrassing quota shortfall. But landowners have been
heard to say, "I don't feel my retirement security should be stolen,
just to satisfy the ego of a politician with conflicts in her
loyalties."
| |

Landowners
stand shoulder-to-shoulder against city, in their battle to
protect basic land
use rights. Notice rare species of "wetland boulders" uncovered in
foreground. |
|
| |
|
"Do I have to level my bush next?," asks neighbour, Mike
Westley... |
| |
|
|
Mike Westley
lives a few doors west of Doug Healy, on Flewellyn. Mike is now
wondering if he must destroy his pristine five-acre bush
---which he has carefully manicured for the last thirty-five
years. He says, "Eight years ago, they tried to re-designate it
as a 'Mineral Extraction Reserve' (gravel pit) designation.
Suddenly, its a wetland!" The only 'wetness' his property
experiences is seasonal flooding by overflowing city ditches
that are poorly maintained. |
The bottom line is,
the affected landowners believe the ward councillor has a huge
personal obligation to remove this "curse" she has imposed on all of
their properties.
"She and her
team of bureaucrats should go back to city hall and spend some
quality time planning on how to properly clean and maintain
ditches, instead of using deficient drainage conditions as an EXCUSE
to compound their folly," says Mike Westley.
He said he was given
to understand that the city's moratorium on wetland designations,
until after Rural Summit discussions have taken place, "did
not include a moratorium on drainage ditch maintenance, as well."
He said, "Janet
promised me weeks ago that she would get onto the drainage problem
right away. She even made a list of about eight problem spots to
address.
So far very
little, if anything, has been accomplished!"
No wonder there's so
little trust.
|