Letter
to the Editor:
De-amalgamation is one rural option
The Ottawa Citizen
Friday, April 02, 2004
 |
|
Bob
McKinley says there is widespread dissatisfaction among rural and suburban
residents with the efficiency and
effectiveness of an amalgamated Ottawa. |
|
CREDIT:
Michael McGee, The Ottawa Citizen |
|
Re: Rural citizens belong in city, March 26.
Rural residents of Ottawa must thank the
Citizen editorialist for leading us down the
path of enlightened understanding. Your
editorial might more appropriately have been
headlined: "Rural citizens belong to city."
The Citizen's assurance that "rural Ottawans"
can depend upon their new Big Brother for help
when needed is comforting. After all, we've
never been capable of looking after our own
affairs, nor have we ever had a sufficient tax
base to support a proper police force or our own
public-health unit. I guess we were just darn
lucky for the 111 years prior to amalgamation.
I'm equally enlightened to learn that rural
representation at city council should decline to
bring representation more in line with our
population. I wrongly assumed rights to
representation were protected by the principles
enunciated by the Supreme Court of Canada and
reinforced by the Ontario Municipal Board when
it repealed the city's odious ward-boundary
bylaw.
The new Rural Council has been instructed by
its members to re-evaluate the relationship
between rural taxpayers and the amalgamated City
of Ottawa. The current relationship is not
acceptable. De-amalgamation is one option to be
studied.
Megacities have been studied across North
America and have been repeatedly identified as
failures. Rural and suburban municipalities
outside the Greenbelt once functioned as a
public service, responsive to the needs of their
constituents.
The level of dissatisfaction with city
government has reached an all-time high since
amalgamation. Rural Ottawa is not alone in
expressing its dissatisfaction with the
inefficiency, over-regulation, and big-spending
practices of the new city. Many suburban
taxpayers also believe that inefficient
government poses a dire threat to providing
essential services and to sustaining social
programs and culture.
Bob McKinley,
Rideau