|
MOE'S RURAL/URBAN
DOUBLE-STANDARD:
TOUGH ON LAW-ABIDING RURALS - EASY ON
LAW-BREAKING CITIES
|

MOE response to water fears has lunitics
running asylum
Terrorists granted more civil liberties than rural
church
leaders and volunteers using MOE 'logic' on water
safety
By Bob Mckinley
The lunatics are firmly in control of
the asylum at the Ontario Ministry of the Environment.
The Walkerton inquiry presided over by
Justice O’Connor concluded that "source protection is a missing
element in ensuring Ontario's water supply." The Minister’s
subsequent "White Paper" response acknowledges the need for source
protection plans to be implemented locally for every watershed, in
order to place safe clean livable communities in a "priority"
position in Ontario.
Here’s how they are doing so far.
Regulation 170/03 to The Safe Drinking
Water Act remains in full force, despite overwhelming public
pressure to repeal or substantially modify it. The regulation is
designed to subject every rural religious institution, service club,
recreational association and small business to unnecessary and
unaffordable supervision, testing and capital investment even though
the wells have a proven history of providing safe well water to the
public.
The regulation also empowers its
enforcers to subject facilities owned by these institutions to
search and seizure without benefit of a warrant or court order. The
Ministry therefore ranks the civil liberties of rural volunteers,
and church leaders below those of criminals or terrorists.
The Regulation which, also applies the
municipal systems, is being implemented. The City of Ottawa, which
contains more rural area than any other city in Ontario, owns 103
facilities served by wells. The city has identified seven as needing
some form of treatment and is dealing with them. Although the
remaining safe systems are subject to the scrutiny of the office of
the Medical Officer of Health, the Minister still requires that the
regulation be implemented at a capital cost of $1.2 Million and an
annual operating expense of $ 500,000.00.
| |
| |
While the Ministry is “protecting” our
safe water supply, it has refused to step in and protect
the Village of Richmond, where a substantial risk to thousands
of residents has been clearly documented. Those residents will soon
see untreated sewage pumped under pressure through a new
sewer being built by the City of Ottawa within meters of
hundreds of shallow private wells.
|
|
|
|
|
Well done Leona!!
I trust your rural constituents will
properly reward you in the next provincial election.
While the Ministry is “protecting” our
safe water supply, it has refused to step in and protect the Village of Richmond, where a substantial risk to thousands
of residents has been clearly documented. Those residents will soon
see untreated sewage pumped under pressure through a new sewer being
built by the City of Ottawa within meters of hundreds of shallow
private wells.
| |
| |
Undaunted, staff at the Ministry and
the city still “deem” the system to be safe because pipes never
fail. It’s proven technology. The fact that the sewer's first phase
currently in use, has repeatedly ruptured, spewing raw sewage
undetected into the aquifer for weeks at time, hasn’t raised an
eyebrow.
|
|
|
|
|
The community’s efforts to protect
itself began with an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board in 2001.
After hearing extensive evidence, the OMB refused to accept the city
position that the system would be safe, and directed it to retain an
independent consultant to re-evaluate its options for the proposed
pipe line and an on-site treatment facility, which would pose no
threat to Richmond.
| |
| |
"When I first heard of this case, I
couldn’t understand how a sophisticated municipal council could
knowingly subject its residents to such obvious risk."
-Bob McKinley, President of the Ottawa
Rural Council
|
|
|
|
|
The independent review recommended
against the pipe line.
Strike two.
Undaunted, staff at the Ministry and
the city still “deem” the system to be safe because pipes never
fail. It’s proven technology. The fact that the sewer's first phase
currently in use, has repeatedly ruptured, spewing raw sewage
undetected into the aquifer for weeks at time, hasn’t raised an
eyebrow.
When I first heard of this case, I
couldn’t understand how a sophisticated municipal council could
knowingly subject its residents to such obvious risk.
I was horrified when I read the staff
report recommending approval of the pipeline. It makes no mention of
the pipes prior failures. Funding has now been approved and
construction is underway.
The story doesn’t end here.
Recently,
Ottawa’s "Big Pipe" guys were promoting another forcemain that would
pump toxic waste from the city dump through an urban residential
community, served by piped water. Ottawa council did the right
thing this time, rejecting the proposed pipeline in favour of an
on-site treatment plant.
Why the change
in heart?
This time they
knew about the failing pipes in Richmond.
One can only
wonder what would happen had the Minister not placed “safe, clean
livable communities" in a priority position in Ontario.
Bob
McKinley is the president of the Ottawa Rural Council
- FREE PRESS ADVOCATE -
|