|
Mayor's vision
for city invisible
Randall Denley The
Ottawa Citizen
Thursday, January 13, 2005
|
|

Randall
Denley |
One thing quite clear in the second year of Bob Chiarelli's third term as leader of this city is that he's a leader
in name only. The mayor's "state of the city" address yesterday was
a painful reminder of the narrowness of his vision for Ottawa.
| |
| |
Little or no progress has been made
on turning our suburbs into livable communities with jobs, small
downtowns of their own, and things people can walk to. Instead,
everything is geared to the decades-old idea that everyone should
work downtown, then take transit back to their 1970s-style suburbs
at night, before driving to the big-box stores to shop.
|
|
|
|
|
His speech could have easily been
mistaken for an accountant's report, a catalogue of capital spending
and "people infrastructure," even down to things like a "state of
the art skateboard park."
It was an address devoid of any
real ideas, of any passion, of any excitement, of anything that
would seize the public's imagination. Passion and excitement aren't
part of the mayor's natural repertoire, but Bill Clinton could have
put you to sleep reading this one.
The mayor buys into every stale,
old, Liberal idea, and regards it as an accomplishment to get the
federal and provincial governments to give the city more of our
money, so he can keep doing those same old things.
He made particular mention of the
city's plan to expand social housing, a plan that is not supported
by logic or any actual money in this year's budget. The mayor says
that more affordable housing is one of the biggest priorities for
the city. You'd think there would be money for it, if so. Does he
really think that affordable housing is a priority for taxpayers who
have to dog the city to get the streets plowed?
Chiarelli
also continued his tradition of offering sops to groups that he
ignores. This time it's a business advisory committee that will
offer advice on policies that affect small and medium-sized
businesses. What will he do if they advise him to give them some
service for their high taxes?
Rural folks also got a nod.
| |
| |
The mayor has also discovered that
Ottawa is a "city of communities," and that uniform city policies
won't work equally well in all areas. Correct, but the city has
spent the last four years harmonizing its policies so they will be
the same across the city.
|
|
|
|
|
"I believe we must do a better job
of delivering what our rural residents want -- or don't want,"
Chiarelli said. So far, the city has been big on the don't-want
category. The mayor is calling for a "rural summit" to find ways of
doing a better job in the rural areas. After so many years in
office, shouldn't he already know what to do? It's another excuse to
do nothing.
CHIARELLI HAS ADDED NOTHING TO
CITY
The mayor has also discovered that
Ottawa is a "city of communities," and that uniform city policies
won't work equally well in all areas. Correct, but the city has
spent the last four years harmonizing its policies so they will be
the same across the city.
What's the mayor going to do about
that, really? His answer is a couple of pilot projects that will
improve neighbourhoods.
The challenge of being mayor is to
accomplish something that wouldn't have been done without your
leadership, to change the city for the better. Sure, the city builds
things, but it has under every mayor.
What would have happened if Bob
Chiarelli hadn't been mayor? The big thing he would point to is the
O-Train, and it was featured at the top of his speech. The train
will prevent gridlock, ensuring the future health of ourselves and
the city's economy, he says. Chiarelli even suggested that the train
would prevent smog, although most of Ottawa's smog isn't actually
generated here. The problem is that the fundamental concept of
transit expansion under this mayor is incorrect.
| |
| |
The mayor insists he will run again
in 2006. Why? Citizens should at least be thankful for the warning.
|
|
|
|
|
The city is spending a fortune to
use transit to belatedly make good on far-flung suburban development
that isn't properly serviced with roads, and it's also using the
O-Train as a means to extend suburban sprawl to the south.
Little or no progress has been made
on turning our suburbs into livable communities with jobs, small
downtowns of their own, and things people can walk to. Instead,
everything is geared to the decades-old idea that everyone should
work downtown, then take transit back to their 1970s-style suburbs
at night, before driving to the big-box stores to shop.
Under the mayor's O-Train plan,
transit won't change the way we live for the better, it will just
allow us to keep doing things the same old way.
The city's finances are on a sound
footing, the mayor told us, while his council struggles to keep its
latest tax increase somewhat less than double the rate of inflation.
It has a "realistic and fundable" 10-year financial plan, he
insists, although the city's own long-range financial plan says
there is a gap, over those 10 years, of $675 million between what
the city intends to build and what it can afford.
The city has a great credit rating,
in part because of its firm control on debt, he says. The same
financial plan that forecast the big spending gap calls for a
near-tripling of debt.
"We're helping to build a
world-class capital city," the mayor says. No, we're not. Not much
in Ottawa could truly be called world class. We're like Mississauga,
with rivers.
The mayor insists he will run again
in 2006. Why? Citizens should at least be thankful for the warning.
Contact Randall Denley at 596-3756
or by e-mail, rdenley@thecitizen.canwest.com
© The Ottawa Citizen 2005
|