|
|
 |
|
CREDIT: Pat McGrath, The Ottawa Citizen |
|
Fitzroy Harbour residents are
furious about a Mississippi Valley Conservation decision they
believe will allow thousands of pleasure boats to be towed through
their community each season.
The federal government, Ontario
and Quebec together will provide $1.4 million to establish a truck
and trailer bypass to move boats around Chats Falls dam near
Fitzroy Harbour, west of Ottawa.
The residents are concerned the
conservation authority approval of the bypass through the Morris
Island Conservation Area is the first in a series of decisions
that could result in dozens of boats on trailers each day on quiet
residential streets.
Project manager Gary Wiseman said
yesterday he expects a bypass that will carry about 500 boats a
season will be completed by the fall of 2004. The project still
requires the approval of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
and the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans because it uses
boat ramps on the Ottawa River.
Paul Lehman, general manager of
the Mississippi Valley Conservation, said the authority would have
to approve the boat launches before the bypass goes ahead. He said
the authority has authorized the use of the rail bed and could
approve the boat launches this summer.
The bypass service, which is
already used at five other spots along the river, will use ramps
to put boats onto trailers and set them back into the water on the
other side of the falls.
The Chats Falls Boat Bypass will
mean that for the first time, boats from as far up river as Lake
Timiskaming, 550 kilometres away, will be able to follow the river
to the Nepean and Aylmer sailing clubs.
The bypass would run from Willola
Beach Road around Fitzroy Harbour Provincial Park, through Fitzroy
Harbour and beside an abandoned rail line in the Morris Island
Conservation Area to Lavergne Bay on the Ottawa River.
Village residents say Ottawa
River Project Inc., the non-profit corporation that wants to build
the bypass, should never be allowed to tow boats along residential
streets and past the Morris Island Conservation Area. Opponents
regard the planned bypass it as a safety hazard and a threat to
the scenic conservation area west of Fitzroy Harbour.
Michael Campbell, president of
the Willola Beach Property Owners Association said no one knows
how many boats a season will use the bypass. Mr. Campbell said the
bypass should be on the Quyon Ferry Road where there are fewer
people.
"They shouldn't be putting this
on residential streets where there are people," Mr. Campbell said.
"There are children who skateboard, ride their bikes and play
hockey and elderly people walking on the road. Boaters who aren't
careful could run over children who are swimming."
Bruce Collier, a member of the
Willola Beach Property Owners Association, said residents are
disappointed in their councillor, Eli El-Chantiry, and other
Ottawa council members who support the bypass, they say. Residents
are planning a rally against the project at Fitzroy Harbour
Community Centre today at 5:30 p.m.
"There is no problem with a boat
bypass, but the location is a problem," Mr. Collier said. "In
1998, Mr. Wiseman was quoted as saying there would be 12,000 boats
in a 100-day period. That means 100 boats a day up to 10 metres
long.
"That would disrupt the Morris
Island Conservation Area and quiet residential streets. There
would be loud trucks going past two schools and a park used by 75
small children."
| |
| |
"They shouldn't be putting this
on residential streets where there are people," Mr. Campbell said.
"There are children who skateboard, ride their bikes and play
hockey and elderly people walking on the road. Boaters who aren't
careful could run over children who are swimming."
..."We are trying to figure why they
need to put this through our area," Mr. Collier said. "There
already is a canal which is 75 per cent completed on the Quebec
side of the Chats Falls Dam."
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Collier said tailings from a
lead mine would be used to build a 45-metre earth ramp in the
river at the end of Willola Beach Road and the channel will have
to be dredged, possibly contaminating fish and wells in the area.
"We are trying to figure why they
need to put this through our area," Mr. Collier said. "There
already is a canal which is 75 per cent completed on the Quebec
side of the Chats Falls Dam."
Mr. Wiseman said work stopped on
the canal in 1856 when the builders realized most passengers and
freight would travel by rail. He said it would cost about $20
million to complete the canal compared with $2.2 million for the
bypass.
"The conservation authority has
approved our going through the old rail bed," Mr. Wiseman said.
"We will have to improve the trails and build foot bridges so
people have the option of staying off the rail bed.
"The system has been running
since 1991 (in other communities) and there has never been an
accident or an incident on the water or on the roads. There are
bypasses at Portage du Fort, Bryson, Chapeau, Mattawa and
Timiskaming."
Mr. Wiseman said the bypass will
attract tourists to the river. He said only a "core group of five
or six people" oppose the project.
Mr. El-Chantiry said city council
approved the bypass and allocated $350,000 for the work in April
2003 before he was elected. He said he opposes the proposed route
through village traffic and the conservation area, but added it is
too late to scrap the bypass.
© The Ottawa Citizen 2004
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR:
Boat bypass will destroy
idyllic nature zone
The Ottawa Citizen
Wednesday, June 09, 2004
Re: Trail
mix: Nearby island offers peace and geese, June 5, and Boat
bypass angers residents, June 8.
While my wife
and I were enjoying a walk on one of the trails in Morris Island
Conservation area, we remarked upon the beauty of the hardwood
forest and speculated upon its appearance 100 years in the future.
We agreed its present beauty would be magnificent if properly
cared for. Our treat was the showing of lady's slippers along a
portion of the trail.
At home I
opened the Citizen's travel and leisure section to an article on
Saturday about the conservation area, picturing Penny Scissons on
the causeway that is part of the trail system. Perhaps the picture
could have included a truck hauling a large boat through this area
as part of a proposed boat bypass.
| |
| |
There has been a lack of openness in the whole bypass-
approval process...
|
|
|
|
|
On May 28 the
board of the Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority approved a
staff proposal from the City of Ottawa that would see 500 trips a
season in each direction along this trail. So much for Ms.
Scissons's idyll.
This portion of
the trail is part of a route enmeshed in community opposition. The
residents of Fitzroy Harbour, now in the city, will see the same
boats passing regularly through quiet residential streets. The
proposed upper end of the boat bypass will require dredging and
dock building in a sensitive fish-spawning area.
There has been
a lack of openness in the whole bypass- approval process, which
despite strong opposition and a potential cost of several millions
of taxpayers' dollars appears headed for approval.
Lawrie Daub,
Arnprior
© The Ottawa
Citizen 2004
Ruining wilderness
The Ottawa Citizen
June 9, 2004
A magnificent
wilderness and recreation area is about to be ruined. A bypass
will truck power boats around the Chats Falls hydroelectric dam
and plow right through Morris Island Conservation Area.
To mitigate the
destruction of the habitat and peacefulness of the conservation
area, the proponent is required to put up interpretive signs and
build lay-bys so pedestrians can get out of the way.
Karen McKenna,
Ottawa
© The Ottawa
Citizen 2004
Quebec route is better for boat
bypass
The Ottawa Citizen
Friday,
June 11, 2004
Re: Time to launch
tourism boat, June 9.
Building the
Chat's Falls dam boat bypass through Morris Island Conservation
Area will permanently ruin that area whether or not there is
"really just a trickle of boat traffic -- rather than up to
12,000 as some residents fear" for the season.
The requirement to
excavate by widening the main trail will disrupt natural
habitation and create a devastating landscaping eyesore instead
of its present natural tranquility. This conservation area is
the only designated natural protected area on the Lac des Chats
portion of the Ottawa River. Once destroyed, the beautiful
landscape is forever gone. This conservation area must be
retained in as natural a form as possible, rather than allowing
the removal of trees for trail widening with the risk of
contamination from leaking oil.
The Mississippi
Valley Conservation Authority, Ontario Ministry of Natural
Resources, federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the
City of Ottawa including ward councillor, Eli El-Chantiry, must
immediately contact Pontiac Municipality on the Quebec side and
Hydro Quebec to discuss building an alternative road less than a
kilometre long, adjacent to the unfinished canal (west of the
Chats Falls Dam on the Quebec side) compared to a proposed
12-kilometre roadway on the Ontario side. The advantages are
reduced travel time for boaters and costs savings if the new
road is built for a shorter distance.
Andrew R. Craig,
Ottawa
© The Ottawa
Citizen 2004
The Ottawa Citizen
June 14, 2004
Re: Time to launch tourism boat, June 9.
The Citizen editorial paints an idyllic
picture of tourists enjoying the beauties of the Ottawa River
from Lake Temiskaming to the Nepean Sailing Club. Please note
that this is a "sailing club," not a "motorboat club."
In general, the most likely users of a boat
bypass are owners of large motorboats. All sailboats have
masts, which makes it inconvenient for them to use a bypass,
and many have fixed keels that are unsuitable with the
proposed system.
The last thing we need on the Ottawa River are
more noisy, polluting, environmentally damaging oversized
motorboats. Those of us who enjoy the tranquility of the
environment and value the integrity of the river's shoreline
find it difficult to understand how taxpayers' money can be
wasted on such a demonstrably unnecessary project.
Using the editorial's argument, it would seem
that only few hundred well-heeled power boat users will enjoy
the benefits of more than $3-million public funding.
Angie Shepherd,
Kinburn
© The Ottawa Citizen 2004
City
ignores valid boat-bypass concerns
The Ottawa Citizen
June 15, 2004
 |
|
CREDIT: Jana Chytilova,
The Ottawa Citizen |
|
Lorne Clark, left, shown
with his sons Darryl, 18 and Graham, 20, says
planning for a proposed boat bypass has ignored
valid options that would allow use of existing
highways instead of a trail in the Morris Island
Conservation Area (behind them). |
|
Re: Time to
launch tourism boat, June 9.
Along with my
two sons, I joined 200 other residents last Tuesday for a
discussion of the proposed Fitzroy Harbour boat bypass. The
most poignant moment was when nearly all 200 raised their
hands as a visible display of opposition to the proposed
route. No area people spoke in favor of the bypass, and
concerns were raised about all portions of the route.
Engineers and
officials provided very informative presentations and
responded to questions. The citizens raised
very solid concerns with respect to child safety, impact on
emergency services, environmental impact, economic viability
(short and long-term), and the lack of transparency and
accountability by Ottawa council.
Repeated
requests have been made to see the business plan and
environmental studies, but none has been provided.
The engineer provided a synopsis of the 14
considered sites and why they saw only one viable route. The
key factor to eliminate all other routes was highway safety,
not environmental impact or the safety of children.
| |
| |
The citizens raised very solid concerns
with respect to child safety, impact on
emergency services, environmental impact,
economic viability (short and long-term), and
the lack of transparency and accountability by
Ottawa council.
...Decisions are made at city hall by councillors
who review glossed-over summaries. They do not
take the time to understand the valid concerns
of their new rural residents.
|
|
|
|
|
The boat trailers are restricted to a speed
of 60 km/h, because to go faster would severely
inconvenience vacationing boaters as they would need to
spend more time securing their boats for transportation. So
the preferred solution is to have the boats travel on roads
posted for slower speeds, such as residential streets,
school zones, conservation areas and rural roads.
The engineer indicated that the option of
properly securing the boats so that they could travel at
highway speeds at 80 km/h was not considered. This would
enable transport of boats on secondary highways and reduce
the requirement for new infrastructure.
The Citizen's editorial is naive, but it
does illustrate a key issue: Decisions are made at city hall
by councillors who review glossed-over summaries. They do
not take the time to understand the valid concerns of their
new rural residents. The boat bypass is a good issue to
change that.
Lorne Clark,
Arnprior
© The Ottawa Citizen 2004