Willola’s “Peaceful Protest” Draws Crowd
By Sarah Trant
July 23, 2004
Neither the heat nor the weatherman’s storm
warnings were enough to deter West Carleton residents who flocked
out to Willola Beach’s well-publicized protest against the proposed
Chats Falls boat bypass.
|
The promise had been for “fun” as
well as harder hitting items, and fun there was.
Folk-rock singer/songwriter Lynda Grenier who told the crowd
that she was “contemplating life in Lanark County” was in great
voice. She entertained her appreciative audience with a
medley of songs as well as one composed for the occasion.
There were hotdogs and ice cream, signs to buy, and information
to exchange. All in all it was a well-planned event mixing
entertainment with hard-hitting speeches from representatives of
a range of organizations while local residents mixed with
visitors to answer questions and provide information on the
practical impact the construction of a 155-metre berm (an
integral part of the bypass project) might have on the area.
Leona Cameron, grandmother and “a
twenty-four-seven” resident of Willola Beach was one of those
who was happy to make her views heard.
The Cameron property lies
adjacent to the small city-owned lot next to which the berm will
be constructed. Cameron is affronted at the way |
|

Willola Beach, Mike Campbell with some
ammunition for Saturday's peaceful protest
|
|
|
|
the lifestyles of the residents of
the area have been totally disregarded by the “people who
started off by calling themselves the proponents, the same way
they told us that they were doing an environmental impact
assessment. Then they told us that it wasn’t exactly
an environmental impact assessment but it was conducted along
the same lines. Then they stopped referring to themselves
as ‘proponents’. I don’t know what they call themselves
now but what they’ve been all along is developers who are
strictly out for themselves,” she said. |
Cameron, who has
not only attended but also actively participated in the string of
public meetings dealing with assorted aspects of the bypass
development, is one of many who feel that they are “simply not
getting all the facts.
“In the
beginning,” she pointed out, “when ‘the proponents’ were busy
selling the idea, we heard that in those areas where other boat
bypasses had been built, the local residents were not only consulted
but kept informed.
“That certainly
hasn’t been the case here. We weren’t consulted and if we’re
informed at all it’s at a very basic level. The
consultants don’t even have a clue as to what sort of area this
really is. Just because they see the houses as small they
refer to them as “cottages” with the assumption that they’re just
summer homes. This is simply not true. These are
permanent homes that will be permanently affected.
“As for meeting
with us one-on-one I can tell you it simply didn’t happen here and,
with the quality of contradictory information we’re given, I very
much wonder if it happened in the other places either.”
Cameron’s
“cottage”, like many others on the river side of the road, is set
some fifty feet or so back from a reed bed where herons fish and
deer come to drink. The land is level. Any significant
change in the river’s flow could cause serious problems to those
residences like hers that back onto the water.
| |
| |
“We hear that
if you want to enlarge your dock you have to get
permission from the City. We hear that you can’t
do anything that might change the natural flow of the
river. So tell me about 155 metres of berm!
What we’re seeing with this Council is that anything
goes if you have the right connections and money behind
you.”
- Leona Cameron, Willola Beach
resident |
|
|
|
|
“I just don’t
understand it,” she goes on. “We hear that if you want to
enlarge your dock you have to get permission from the City. We
hear that you can’t do anything that might change the natural flow
of the river. So tell me about 155 metres of berm! What
we’re seeing with this Council is that anything goes if you have the
right connections and money behind you.”
From Cameron’s
cottage the announcement of the day’s program could be clearly
heard. Willola Beach organizers had assembled an impressive
slate of speakers ranging from Daniel Van Vliet, Chair of the Ottawa
Chapter of the Sierra Club, to People’s Voice Terry Kilrea, Shirley
Dolan representing the West Carleton Rural Association, Bob McKinley
who is President of the Rural Council, and Jack MacLaren, Director
of the Lanark Landowner’s Association who represented President
Randy Hillier.
| |
| |
“In a democracy people expect government to protect their rights but
today we find ourselves more and more often fighting our own
government because it is
threatening our rights. I believe in democracy but it only
works when the people hold their elected officials responsible for
their actions. If we don’t then democracy breaks down
and
that’s what this struggle is all about.”
- Adele
Muldoon, Director of the Rural Council |
|
|
|
|
All of the
speeches were tough, and to the point, but the speech of Rural
Council Director and West Carleton Rural Association Past President
Adele Muldoon’s words set the stage very precisely for the tone
taken by the other speakers.
“In a democracy,”
said Muldoon, “people expect government to protect their rights but
today we find ourselves more and more often fighting our own
government because it is
threatening our rights. I believe in democracy but it only
works when the people hold their elected officials responsible for
their actions. If we don’t then democracy breaks down
and
that’s what this struggle is all about.”
Jack MacLaren
told the audience that “when public officials withhold information
from the public and hide what they’re trying to do, then there is
something very wrong with what they’re doing, and it has to be
stopped,” and in the same vein Kilrea, who despite being a late
entry proved a surprisingly strong contender in the last Mayoralty
election, stressed that “City Council is very little more than a
group of puppets. For the most part they know very little and
appear to care even less about what goes on outside the City core.
To a large degree they’re happy to dance to whatever tune the Mayor
plays and it would seem that without knowing too much about it, the
Mayor is happy to endorse the boat bypass project with our tax
dollars while cutting back on other essential services.”
After commending
the Willola Beach Property Owners Association (WBPOA) for the
excellent organization of the day’s events, Bob McKinley, President
of the recently formed Rural Council, congratulated the residents on
“the excellent job you’re doing of making yourselves heard at City
Hall.”
He then went on
to announce that the preliminary results of the four question survey
which had been circulated in the City’s regional wards showed an
“overwhelmingly high endorsement” of the Rural Council’s efforts to
bring about change.
“The answers
received to the question dealing with the level of satisfaction
regarding city governance shows that there is a huge level of
dissatisfaction with the City’s performance,” said McKinley.
The event,
scheduled to last from 1.00 to 4.00 p.m. finally wound down with a
brief address from WBPOA’s Bruce Collier of who thanked the
residents for “your fighting spirit! We’re not going to
back down now, and we’re not thinking in terms of losing this
battle. Remember the information meeting this Wednesday, the
21st,” said Collier. “It’s a residents’ information
meeting and we’ll be kicking things off at 7.30 p.m. sharp in the
Fitzroy Harbour Community Centre.”
For
interview with President of Rural Council Bob McKinley, please…SEE
BELOW
McKinley Questions City
Approval Process for Boat Bypass
By
Sarah Trant
July 23, 2004
Rural Council President Bob McKinley is
questioning the City’s approval process for the proposed Chats Falls
Boat Bypass.
“We’re being told that this will not go before
full Council,” he told the West Carleton Review. “The decision
on the project will, in essence, be made by the Corporate Services
and Economic Development Committee based on the rationale that
Council already made a decision back in 2002, prior to the
election.”
In discussions with the City Solicitor, McKinley
pointed out that all that was decided in 2002 (and recorded in the
Minutes) was that a one-time grant of $350,000 would be made to the
partnership to fund the capital costs of the improvement.
“I also explained that in the Minutes of the
2002 June 24th meeting, the proposed route which formed
the basis for the proposed bypass was through Fitzroy Provincial
Park – a route which was, subsequently, disqualified.”
| |
| |
McKinley
told the West Carleton Review that he was appalled that
despite the fact that other, well-respected national
agencies had warned that the outcome of such a radical
invasion of the river and waterfront could have horrific
results in terms of irreparable environmental damage,
the developer was not even being asked to engage in the
usual, thorough, environmental impact studies of the
areas involved such as the Ottawa River and the
Conservation area.
“That,” concluded McKinley, “in my thirty
years of dealing with the Municipality is highly unusual, and
extremely suspect.”
|
|
|
|
|
The City’s position, according to McKinley, is
that the decisions made at the 2002 meeting pre-empt the proposal
being presented to Council, despite the recent route changes which
have occurred.
“I do not find the process acceptable,”
asserted McKinley. “The blanket approval of a Committee,
made more than two years ago, for a project where the parameters
have changed significantly, seems highly suspect and is, at best,
unacceptable and, at worst, lacks integrity.”
Public consultation has taken place but without
open access to public documents. Although some portion of
those relevant documents (although not all) is being made available,
despite formal demand being made, the documents themselves remain
out of reach.
“We’re not asking for anything unusual here,”
says McKinley. “There is a right to this kind of information
under provincial legislation.”
According to McKinley, City staff take the
position that the Willola Beach corridor proposal although never
mentioned in the Minutes of the June 2002 Committee meeting does
not require Council’s approval and can be dealt with adequately
and appropriately by Corporate Services.
“When they meet on August 17th,
Corporate Services will be in the position of granting permission
for a right of passage across public lands without Council’s
approval and without the vote of the Councillor who represents the
interests of the people impacted because,” emphasized McKinley,
“Councillor El-Chantiry does not sit on the Corporate
Services Committee.
“What it boils down to is that there will be
no one representing the communities involved when that Committee
sits down to make the decision. This,” said McKinley,
“is what the City sees as the democratic process in action.”
In closing McKinley told the West Carleton
Review that he was appalled that despite the fact that other,
well-respected national agencies had warned that the outcome of such
a radical invasion of the river and waterfront could have horrific
results in terms of irreparable environmental damage, the developer
was not even being asked to engage in the usual, thorough,
environmental impact studies of the areas involved such as the
Ottawa River and the Conservation area.
“That,” concluded McKinley, “in my thirty
years of dealing with the Municipality is highly unusual, and
extremely suspect.”
In the unlikely
event that the proposal were to be presented to City Council, a
simple majority vote is all that would be needed to resolve the
issue.
West Carleton
Review
|